He argued this was “not merely as an indication of regard to his monotheistic Christian faith, but additionally as a sign of respect towards the sentiments of his troops so that his non-participation when in the inner shrine would not desecrate and offend their religious sentiments.”
The bench mentioned even though “he may be an outstanding officer in hundreds of factors, but he is without a doubt a misfit with the Indian Army” known for its discipline and secular method.
Sankaranarayanan reported, “I only reported don’t make me enter the mandir and gurudwara to complete ceremonies.” Justice Bagchi requested, “Where by during the Christian faith does getting into the temple or maybe a religious institution of another faith barred?”
Justice Bhagchi then claimed: “You'll want to respect collective religion. Even a pastor counselled you You will need to lead by example you're insulting the religion of one's regiment. Sure you might have personally interpreted your religion as not allowing to go Within the put... But this is simply not A vital function if we go with the pastor or other Christian troopers.
The tone and tenor and way by which He's acting, is he not insulting his individual troopers?… We have been stunned he doesn’t even observe the advice from the pastor,” Justice Kant stated.
"He may very well be An impressive officer, but he is a misfit for that Indian Army. The responsibilities our forces shoulder presently… this isn't the behaviour we will entertain."
The defendent further more argued that these religious ceremonies cannot be pressured on him as well as disputed The truth that there exist a Sarv Dharm Sthal, backing his responses along with his arguments within the Delhi Substantial Court in May perhaps this calendar year.
Sankaranarayanan argued that the Army had dismissed him for only one infraction and that the officer had proven respect for other religions by participating in festivals for instance Holi and Diwali.
SC agrees to quash prison proceedings against Sandesaras on payment of ₹5100 crore in fraud case
He stated that he remained within the temple courtyard, adhering to protocols like taking away his sneakers and belt, and putting on more info a turban when needed, to show solidarity with his troops.
He added that on the list of Vedas “in truth speaks on the unity of various Gods in a single”. “The pastor who is a lot more learned in the Christian religion encouraged you to definitely do, but you have your own private comprehension when pastor advises you cant have your very own interpretation.”
Also go through
Adv Sankarnarayanan countered: “I can not Possess a say in religion. Pastor explained to him with regards to the Sarvdharm sthal. But no one can problem my faith.
Even though rejecting his plea, the Delhi Superior Court had reasoned which the said petitioner saved his faith higher than his superiors' lawful command.